Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:04:56 -0800 (PST)
From:      Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To:        strick@covad.net
Cc:        scottl@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 4.9 is now available
Message-ID:  <200310310305.h9V34ueF033773@gw.catspoiler.org>
In-Reply-To: <200310301808.h9UI8qaZ000347@ice.nodomain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 Oct, Dan Strick wrote:
> Scott Long wrote:
>>
>> 5.x uses an entirely different mechanism to make the CD bootable.  The
>> mechanism used in 4.x is similar to what Microsoft used for the Windows
>> 95/98 CD's (Emulated El-Torito), while 5.x uses a similar mechanism as
>> Windows 2000/XP (Non-Emulated El-Torito).  Since Microsoft only requires
>> support for the second method in order to award the MS logo, I suspect
>> that support for the first method is starting to die out in mainstream
>> BIOSes.
>
> Some possibly relevant/confirming data points:
>   1) My Win98 CD fails to boot on my new machine.
>   2) My Win98SE CD boots correctly.
>   3) My WinXP CD boots correctly.
> 
> This could prove very inconvenient for a lot of people who are
> now buying new machines and hope to run FreeBSD 4.9 because it
> has better support for modern motherboard devices.  I tested
> 4.9-prerelease support for all of my motherboard devices, but
> it never occurred to me to test the CD bootstrap.

Can older machines boot from Non-Emulated El-Torito CDs?  If not, it
might be nice to be able to generate CDs of either flavor. This would be
painful for FreeBSD CD vendors, though ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310310305.h9V34ueF033773>