Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:54:31 -1000 From: Kent Hauser <kent.hauser@verizon.net> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: djbfft package Message-ID: <200311032254.32016.kent.hauser@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <oprx3ulbvt8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> References: <200311032131.02892.kent.hauser@verizon.net> <oprx3ulbvt8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 03 November 2003 10:45 pm, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:31:02 -1000, Kent Hauser <kent.hauser@verizon.net> > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Why is math/djbfft marked NO_PACKAGE & what in the world does the message > > mean? > > > > Makefile:NO_PACKAGE= Forbidden - we have patches to the distribution. > > > > I don't get it, as packages are build after build, which is obviously > > after > > patch. > > DJB's license doesn't allow us to distribute binaries. > > Cheers, > Mezz > > > Thanks, Kent Isn't this what the NO_CDROM / NO_BUILD variables are for? I build an internal distribution CD set with packages we use. Things like "linux-realplayer" package just fine. The DJBFFT restriction screws up "portinstall -rRp -m -DBATCH multimedia/okle" Thanks for clearing up the reason. I still think the "Forbidden - we have patches" message is cryptic. Cheers, Kent
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311032254.32016.kent.hauser>