Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 03:24:21 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of unionfs in -STABLE Message-ID: <20031109112421.GA94746@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20031109085459.GA31751@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20031109085459.GA31751@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:54:59PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > Recently I've began to consider making some use of unionfs in > (semi-)production environment. Can someone aware of its current status > in -STABLE comment a bit on this subject? >=20 > Probably any information would be appreciated. Unchanged since the other times this topic has been discussed recently - see the archives for extensive discussion. (Summary: it's possible to avoid panicking if you carefully restrict the activities you do with unionfs, but expect panics and possible filesystem corruption while discovering those limits). Kris --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/riPlWry0BWjoQKURArQ/AKD55bjLqLZE+x9/hOIAJ/CuStsW1ACfeGGV oQE/Elt0sOBdy1ioDOItx3Y= =KR2R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031109112421.GA94746>