Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 02:29:51 +0100 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: ".VWV." <victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what's unix and what's not Message-ID: <20031126012951.GC1068@dds.nl> In-Reply-To: <000701c3b2ef$a617a080$7ffc2dd5@workstation> References: <000701c3b2ef$a617a080$7ffc2dd5@workstation>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:01:24AM +0100, .VWV. wrote: > what's unix and what's not? I feel that *anything* that is based up on the orginal Unix version should be called Unix. So I would say Linux should also be called UNIX or UNIX-BASES, just as *BSD is. Another reason why this difference realy souldn't be thare is that Linux have copies source from BSD in to it own source. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031126012951.GC1068>