Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 11:22:17 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: j.el-rayes@daemon.li Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposed addition to the mail section of the handbook Message-ID: <20031202112217.23a48871.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031202090021.GA269@jenny.daemon.li> References: <3FCBB04F.7070204@potentialtech.com> <20031201221825.GB10158@jenny.daemon.li> <20031202053708.GC71732@unixpages.org> <20031202090021.GA269@jenny.daemon.li>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:00:21 +0100 Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes@daemon.li> wrote: > Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:18:25PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > > > > line 72: it is "manpage" not "man page". > > > Actually it is 'manual page'. > > i prefer too, the expression 'manual page', but as > bill used the short form, i just wanted to point out > that o'reilly writes it 'manpage' and not 'man page'. > > (http://www.oreilly.com/oreilly/author/stylesheet.html#M). It always depends on who you talk to too. Some people say man page, some use manual page, some use manpage. Trust me, this is a bikeshed you don't want to step into... :) -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031202112217.23a48871.trhodes>