Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:20:34 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security chapter.sgml Message-ID: <20031230132034.36281ba6.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200312301749.hBUHnJjx004040@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200312301749.hBUHnJjx004040@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Taken off cvs-all since it's a -doc issue] On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:49:19 -0800 (PST) Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> wrote: First off, I have no problems with this commit, in fact, thank you for catching these; however I do have a point to bring up to -doc. > blackend 2003/12/30 09:49:19 PST > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security chapter.sgml > Log: > In ACL section: > > - Use of &prompt.user; for % > - Add a whitespace between prompt and command for consistency (this > change could be done in a separate commit, but there the whitespace > can be seen as content) > - Use option tags for command line options instead of literal ones. Using option tags? I've been using literal for awhile since another committer told me that they always use literal over option for flags. Which one is preferred? FWIW, I think it was bmah who said that to me during my working of the cron(8) section, but please don't quote me on that. :) -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031230132034.36281ba6.trhodes>