Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:05:33 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc_r/uthread/uthread_join.c Message-ID: <20031231140533.GA56158@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312310838140.25057-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20031231111642.GA13386@stack.nl> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312310838140.25057-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:47:03AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Is there a reason why in the case that a thread is not done yet, > > pthread_join() does not call _thread_kern_sig_undefer() ? > [snip] > > No, it looks like you found a bug. Committed, thanks! Hmm, ok ;-) But then why is _thread_kern_sig_undefer() called within every if-case, instead of just below the if ? It looked like it was contructed this way to be able to omit _thread_kern_sig_undefer() in that specific case... ;-) Zlo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031231140533.GA56158>