Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:47:32 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netgraph.ko vs. compiled in. Message-ID: <20040101194732.GC17271@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3FF47721.3030600@potentialtech.com> References: <3FF47721.3030600@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2JFBq9zoW8cOFH7v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:38:09PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> If I build a kernel with "options netgraph", in order to use mpd,=20
> netgraph.ko
> is still loaded at boot (with an error) but mpd does not work.
You can't simultaneously load a .ko and have the same code compiled
into the kernel.
=20
> If I build the kernel without netgraph, netgraph.ko loads, along with oth=
er
> netgraph modules required for PPTP, and mpd works like a charm.
>=20
> What I haven't tried yet, is compiling a kernel with all the options for =
all
> the netgraph modules I'll need compiled in to see if that works.
It's generally best either to kldload all of the netgraph modules you
require for this purpose or to compile them all into the kernel. One
way, or the other, but not a mixture of both.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
--2JFBq9zoW8cOFH7v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/9HlUdtESqEQa7a0RAuTXAJ9xw9TQO/IBiHjiArvyCgBQ04L+mwCcD5Qb
mkNXAOjtxH597h0oRjWm5Bg=
=Zl2E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2JFBq9zoW8cOFH7v--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040101194732.GC17271>