Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:09:59 -0600
From:      Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com>
To:        FreeBSD-Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: UID conflict: Both database/firebird and net/quagga apeear to use UID 90
Message-ID:  <20040112220959.GH66765@seekingfire.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040112215909.GL1667@k7.mavetju>
References:  <20040112154832.GI491@seekingfire.com> <20040112163450.B150E17DB9@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040112193806.GC52964@seekingfire.com> <20040112215909.GL1667@k7.mavetju>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:59:09AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:38:06PM -0600, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:34:50AM -0600, Pete Fritchman wrote:
> > > If we keep all the UIDs documented there, we should'd have the problem of
> > > people adding a new port with a duplicate UID.  I'm sure there are a ton
> > > of ports that add users with UIDs that are _not_ documented there; we
> > > should probably fix that as we come across them.
> > 
> > There should be a way to automatically catch that. Perhaps a post-build
> > checksum against /etc/master.passwd and /etc/group on an automated
> > ports-building box.
> 
> There is. Well, UIDs allocated. In the porters manual there is a
> list of UIDs (chapter 15.11). The first one in there wins!

To clarify, I meant that there should be a way to automatically catch
the ports that /don't/ follow that process. It could be added as one of
the build checks for the automatic port building machines.

-T


-- 
Humans hardly ever learn from the experience of others. They learn - when they
do, which isn't often - on their own, the hard way.
	- Robert Heinlein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040112220959.GH66765>