Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:17:32 +0100 From: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> To: Fritz Heinrichmeyer <Fritz.Heinrichmeyer@Fernuni-Hagen.de> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: apache2-ports are pickier than before Message-ID: <20040115161732.289807aa.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <1074176333.737.43.camel@jfh00.fernuni-hagen.de> References: <1074176333.737.43.camel@jfh00.fernuni-hagen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Thu__15_Jan_2004_16_17_32_+0100_e95Hq_uTUbG=XhDf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:18:54 +0100 Fritz Heinrichmeyer <Fritz.Heinrichmeyer@Fernuni-Hagen.de> wrote: Hi Fritz ! > as far as i can remember i always was able to build apache ports with > my favorite gcc under stable. This has changed after apache-2.0.48_1 > which is in production here with "gcc-3.3.3 20031103 (prerelease)" > compiled. Did you tried you with PORTREVISION 3 ? PORTREVISION 2 were fairly broken on -STABLE, as we already discussed. > The problem came up together with extensive warning messages out of > autoconf-hell when compiling the port. "autoconf-hell" *is* mandatory for a better flexibility in apache2* ports. I won't remove it, but I want to fix all issues this changes could have. Does apache2 work correctly if you skip post-configure target ? clem --Signature=_Thu__15_Jan_2004_16_17_32_+0100_e95Hq_uTUbG=XhDf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABq8MsRhfjwcjuh0RAhlsAKCautdfPn+sdG0syG2qVjfbC6ibpQCfcbeS ouuxZGGWllZgkRMhnQmvDMs= =nOJ1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__15_Jan_2004_16_17_32_+0100_e95Hq_uTUbG=XhDf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115161732.289807aa.sheepkiller>