Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:23:32 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic with this morning's (~9am EDT, 15 jan 2004) sources. Message-ID: <200401161523.32120.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpvfnbslix.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC0108D8@EBE1.gc.nat> <200401161458.34197.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <xzpvfnbslix.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 16 January 2004 03:09 pm, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > You probably don't need to lock the new filedesc structure
> > while you are creating it until you've actually hooked it up to a
> > proc structure.
>
> Yes, I do. fdgrowtable() for instance asserts that the filedesc is
> locked.
Then do this:
while (newfdp blah fdp) {
FILEDESC_UNLOCK(fdp);
FILEDESC_LOCK(newfdp);
fd_growtable(newfdp);
FILEDESC_UNLOCK(newfdp);
FILEDESC_LOCK(fdp);
}
Since no other CPU or thread can possibly go near newfdp until it is hooked=
=20
into a process, you don't need to worry about locking it other than to=20
satisfy assertions while you are constructing it.
=2D-=20
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve" =3D http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401161523.32120.jhb>