Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:26:13 -0800 From: Matt Olander <matt@offmyserver.com> To: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reply to V. Velox & questions about ``evangelism'' Message-ID: <20040116162613.G91963@knight.ixsystems.net> In-Reply-To: <4008807B.5090105@sitetronics.com>; from dodell@sitetronics.com on Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 01:23:23AM %2B0100 References: <008001c3dc8a$624914a0$60d0fea9@workstation> <4008807B.5090105@sitetronics.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 01:23:23AM +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > In more on-topic discussion, when Linux (indeed, users from other OSes) ask > some of the ``major differences'' between Product X and FreeBSD, what are some > of the answers you give other than the license and the fact that BSD is a > complete system instead of just a kernel? I'm sure there are many original > things out there that people have come across, either in their conversion > process or while ``converting others'' -- I'm attempting to improve my arsenal > as it were. good question. key points I always touch on are: ports collection ease of administration professional development cycle single point of contact (freebsd.org) comprehensive documentation high load capability source code maturity stability/reliability cheers, -matt -- Matt Olander (408)943-4100 Phone (408)943-4101 Fax www.offmyserver.com -- "Those who don't read have no advantage over those who can't" -Mark Twain
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040116162613.G91963>