Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:19:41 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb -U fails Message-ID: <20040202211941.GC90670@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040202204500.GA82776@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> References: <20040130195143.GA93830@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> <20040201212348.GA24109@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040202075512.GA54021@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> <200402020227.32815.kstewart@owt.com> <20040202204500.GA82776@seatle.vredesdorp.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:45:00PM +0100, r t g tan wrote: > > Then why not quit banging you head on a wall and use "make index". Your > > failure to adapt is spamming the list. Portsdb -U has not produced > > totally clean INDEX runs since I can remember. Make index, on the other > > hand, is currently producing clean makes. > > > > There are times when one doesn't work and the other does. You just have > > to not refuse anything but ports/INDEX. > > > > Kent > > > > -- > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > > > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > make index fails as well with a bunch of make_index: no entrie messages. > > I guess Ill leave it at this waiting for it to get fixed. It's not broken. Please reread earlier advice given to you. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAHr7tWry0BWjoQKURAudhAKCZH6bujqrX9eWbpa3I2Y8SkNAm8gCdHWEl bLTmw1i11AQVTRylroC6LrQ= =GYHX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040202211941.GC90670>