Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:51 -0500 From: stan <stanb@panix.com> To: FreeBSD Ports List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems (linux emulation?) building Openoffice 1.1 Message-ID: <20040210222951.GB27223@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <20040210132410.F90776@blues.jpj.net> References: <20040210180238.GA16205@teddy.fas.com> <40291E81.6010803@math.missouri.edu> <20040210132410.F90776@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:26:46PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > > stan wrote: > > > > > > It's possible that teh problem amy be with the linux emulation. I say that > > > because while I was doing portupgrade on this machien, last weekeend, I was > > > prompted yo manually crate a null device in the "chroot's home of Linux > > > emulation". Not knowing where the default for this is, I just hit return, > > > and it appeared that the build wnet OK, but ... > > > > > > Yes, I have loaded the linux emulation kernel module, and mounted teh linux > > > procfs: > > > > > > > > > I have noticed that when the linux_base port is installed, that it umounts > > linproc. So maybe even though you mounted linprocfs before you started, by the > > time you get to the build of jdk14, it is no longer mounted. > > It's supposed to mount linproc (or linprocfs) again once the installation > completes. If you have the latest pkg-install and it still doesn't do > this, let me know. > > MD5 (/usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/pkg-install) = > 301f1b59c43944eff156b102b4b16dbd > BTW, do you now where teh default "jail" for linux_base is? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040210222951.GB27223>