Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:18:31 +1100 From: "Andrew Reilly" <areilly@bigpond.net.au> To: Tom Arnold <xyzzy@sysabend.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming filesystems? Message-ID: <20040213041831.GA12350@gurney.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <20040213024837.GQ13780@moo.sysabend.org> References: <20040212235605.GP13780@moo.sysabend.org> <20040213022010.GA2331@frontfree.net> <20040213024837.GQ13780@moo.sysabend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:48:38PM -0800, Tom Arnold wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:20:10AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > > Personally I'd prefer the SoftUpdates approach, so I am more interested > > in what made you to think it doesn't fit your needs, performance? > > security features? or others? > > Boot time. Large small-block filesystems take forever to come > up at bootime Forever being approx 10 minutes per filesystem > for the snapshot to occur, with 3 filesystems on the machine > it adds up. Why are your filsystems going down dirty? Are you crashing the system, or is your power supply dodgy? If it's the latter, then a UPS ought to sort out the problem. If you shutdown cleanly, then it should come up without needing a fsck at all (background or otherwise). -- Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040213041831.GA12350>