Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:58:05 +0900 (JST) From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/flashpluginwrapper Message-ID: <200402181358.i1IDw5Xh050695@sakura.ninth-nine.com> In-Reply-To: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Feb 2004 01:27:43 -0500 Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> wrote: > Please reconsider removing flashpluginwrapper. I find it ludicrous that > I should have to manually apply a patch every time I want to update my > system. As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it to > remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support > linuxpluginwrapper. > This port is not deprecated. It is still of use to those of us who don't > wish to be manually applying patches to src all the time. I don't know why you said such a thing. I see. linimon@ was committed about it. OK. I will not remove flashpluginwrapper. But I think that anyone doesn't want to use this port. Because it was upgrade to linuxpluginwrapper. Of cause, I know many people who is using non-libmap.conf(5) feature's environment. So I'm keeping it. In the current case, I was wrong to set IGNORE. So I'll change like following lines. Please wait (or Adam, you can commit by my approval). 1. remove IGNORE, EXPIRATION_DATE. 2. change MAINTAINER to ports@. 3. replace pre-everything:: or DEPRECATED from IGNORE message. Is this OK?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402181358.i1IDw5Xh050695>