Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:53:15 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Mike B <meb@cinci.rr.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: problem with ld-elf.so.1 install Message-ID: <20040219195315.GA33224@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <40350EC8.9050900@cinci.rr.com> References: <20040216014850.GA866@panzer.kdm.org> <4034AAFC.4000502@cinci.rr.com> <20040219092610.A49765@carver.gumbysoft.com> <40350EC8.9050900@cinci.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:30:16PM -0500, Mike B wrote: > I didn't change anything explicitly related to it but I could have > inadvertently messed it up. It is strange though that I would be able to > recompile the programs with no problem while the existing ones would > produce this error. Was there some change of libstdc++ between 5.2.1RC2 > and -CURRENT? I'm wary of moving back to -CURRENT because of this > (OpenOffice is > 8 hrs to compile and I depend on it day to day). Thanks > for your observations. > > Mike > > Doug White wrote: > > >Did you mess up libstdc++? Those symbols come out of there. > > Please don't top-post. You lose context that way. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040219195315.GA33224>