Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:58:39 +0300 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org.ru> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@gmx.de> Cc: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> Subject: Subject: Re: ports/62690: Postfix with LDAP support fails to compile Message-ID: <20040220135839.GH49750@freebsd.org.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:22:29PM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > >[...] > > > >I would like to commit following patch, its also fix build problem > >with openldap20, please review and approve. > > FYI: OpenLDAP 2.0 is deprecated and scheduled for removal May 2004. > OpenLDAP 1.2 will be removed April 2004 and shouldn't be used under any > circumstances (it is marked FORBIDDEN). > > Generally users expect that when they set WANT_OPENLDAP_VER in make.conf(5), > pkgtools.conf(5) or on the command line that this is honored by ports. > The rationale is that different versions of OpenLDAP can't coexist and > it is therefore easy for the user to choose her preferred version. > > Furthermore WANT_OPENLDAP_VER has a default in bsd.port.mk, which makes it > easy to switch versions and build non-conflicting packages. Currently > OpenLDAP 2.1 is the default, but I plan to switch to 2.2 if it is stable > enough and eventually the OpenLDAP project ceases support for 2.1. > > I am aware that this doesn't fit well in the scheme how postfix > configuration works now, but it would be nice if we could have a > consistent ports tree, at last in this regard. OK, I see your point of view. Do you have any patches against current version of postfix port? -- Regards, /"\ ascii ribbon campaign Sergey "ozz" Osokin, \ / against html mail http://ozz.pp.ru/ X and news / \
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040220135839.GH49750>