Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 23:46:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Packages with diablo dependencies Message-ID: <20040222074600.GA71722@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040222073907.GA95266@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20040222004847.GA57661@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040222062539.GA50119@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20040222073554.GA71568@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040222073907.GA95266@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:39:07AM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:35:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:25:39PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:48:47PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > It looks like 51 ports now depend on the diablo ports to build; this > > > > means the packages cannot be built on bento, since the diablo packages > > > > are interactive and impossible to build there. Can you please do > > > > something about this? > > > > > > Last time this came up I volunteered the attached patch. Does it fix the > > > problem or not? I didn't hear whether it did or didn't. If it does fix > > > the problem I'll commit it. If not, can you suggest a variable the package > > > install script can test for to workaround things on bento? > > > > Well, I modified bento to set that variable in the build environment, > > and now it just hangs: > > > > [...] > > this Agreement which, in Foundation's opinion, reasonably preserves > > the intent of this Agreement. This Agreement is binding upon and > > shall inure to the benefit of Foundation and its successors and > > assigns. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the > > parties, and superceded all previous communications, written or > > oral, relating to the subject of this Agreement. > > > > > > Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no] > > If it gets here its gotten too far. The idea of the patch was to bypass > this for bento. > > Are there _any_ special environment variables that bento sets when its > installing the packages for a build? All we need is something which > the package install script and test for and say "Ok, this is bento". I mentioned above that bento now sets PACKAGE_BUILDING in the build environment. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAOF44Wry0BWjoQKURAr19AJ9+pFhxL5Yq2I9F46BnGIK9blwLngCg3jUH jbqZ8cLOpchb6Vz7Yq2DtJw= =T1Ay -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222074600.GA71722>