Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:38:50 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Subject: Re: OPTIONS, LATEST_LINK, and RCng Message-ID: <20040223203840.GE20557@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20040223132524.GA520@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> References: <20040223120917.608.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <4039F58C.1020004@fillmore-labs.com> <20040223132524.GA520@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3XA6nns4nE4KvaS/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:25:24PM +0100, Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > www/squid respects rcNG but does not enforce its use on non-rcNG > systems. I do not know why this is such a problem for you. I would > really like you to stop doing advocacy on this right now and instead ask > you to respect what I have done. Thanks. This seems like a recipe for confused users. If you don't have rc.subr installed and you get squid run a running, it will break if you install a port that installs rc.subr. That's a major POLA violation in my book. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --3XA6nns4nE4KvaS/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAOmTEXY6L6fI4GtQRArpmAKCKClnjMsUanngotxeIRQQsXClOKQCeJaOf M7HnA5QeqwWpVG2zLJjZ4xM= =/QHc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3XA6nns4nE4KvaS/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040223203840.GE20557>