Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 04:07:17 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: bugsgrief@bugsgrief.net Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [kris@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: ports/lang/nawk Makefile] Message-ID: <20040226.040717.78715574.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20040225.152439.1a5c09661a0c01c9.10.0.3.9@bugsgrief.net> <20040224.235412.e05ccefc82735f8f.10.0.3.9@bugsgrief.net> References: <20040224.235412.e05ccefc82735f8f.10.0.3.9@bugsgrief.net> <20040225020325.GA60758@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040225.152439.1a5c09661a0c01c9.10.0.3.9@bugsgrief.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Thu_Feb_26_04_07_17_2004_499)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit horio shoichi <bugsgrief@bugsgrief.net> wrote in <20040224.235412.e05ccefc82735f8f.10.0.3.9@bugsgrief.net>: bugsgrief> Marking BROKEN against this sort of trouble makes the retrieval bugsgrief> of the newer ones difficult. Better turn it off ? Simply updating the port solves the problem, doesn't it? I cannot understand what you are trying to say, honestly speaking. If a distfile that includes no version number in its filename is used, the port should be updated when the distfile is updated. Or, the maintainer can separately prepare the distfile whose filename includes its version number by himself. Anyway, I think the problem is not due to the ports infrastructure itself. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Feb_26_04_07_17_2004_499)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAPPJlTyzT2CeTzy0RArmcAJ0bEC1gdF24yo1/iVDaXGIsvdR7fgCfWgui qdB3kDgV7dKd/WjKdurcl2Y= =AYNF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Feb_26_04_07_17_2004_499)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040226.040717.78715574.hrs>