Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 21:58:28 +0000 From: Mark Murray <markm@freebsd.org> To: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NULL vs 0 vs 0L bikeshed time Message-ID: <200403012158.i21LwS0w084961@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:34:56 %2B0100." <20040301213454.GA959@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stefan Farfeleder writes: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 03:46:35PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > > -#define NULL 0L > > +#define NULL (0L) > > What's the point of parenthesizing 0L? Its two lexical elements. I got into the habit of doing that when a macro replacement bit me some years ago. It is a very unimportant part of the patch. :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403012158.i21LwS0w084961>