Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:36:41 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Stefan Cars <stefan@snowfall.se> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1 processor vs. 2 Message-ID: <20040303213641.GA37555@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040303222612.W39053@guldivar.globalwire.se> References: <BC6A0533.1DC4C%joe@jwebmedia.com> <40452715.5030304@mindcore.net> <20040303140216.U99563@guldivar.globalwire.se> <200403031453.49069.danny@ricin.com> <20040303160658.GA32905@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040303222612.W39053@guldivar.globalwire.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:26:43PM +0100, Stefan Cars wrote:
> Okey, but if you would compare RAID-1 on two disks compared to RAID-5 on
> three disks then ? What would be the faster ?
RAID1 is going to be faster, both reading and writing, but it will
take a lot more raw disk space to provide the required usable space.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFARk/pdtESqEQa7a0RAqZnAJ4+cx9E+E3lep11+5D06lwosIPltgCgjdJN
xBKzkesM80MvxzqLxuW2ZLw=
=wj5t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040303213641.GA37555>