Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:47:50 +0200
From:      Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org.ua>
To:        "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-www@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: www/64120: /mnt/www/en/ports/needs to be re-run
Message-ID:  <20040311224750.GA20712@phantom.cris.net>
In-Reply-To: <200403112210.i2BMAEgn050693@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200403112210.i2BMAEgn050693@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:10:14PM -0800, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
 
>  On 2004.03.11 15:40:22 -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
>  >=20
>  > 	The top-level 'ports' webpage does not yet reflect the new
>  > 	net-mgmt category.  The category is already listed in the
>  > 	files 'categories', so it seems likely that no one remembered
>  > 	to run the script.
>  
>  Without having checked I'm rather sure the reason is that those pages
>  are based on INDEX and that hasn't been updated since the addition of
>  the new category.
>  
>  The proper solution is of course not to use INDEX from CVS but a freshly
>  build one, but I don't have the time to implement that at the moment.

IMO, The proper solution is to leave it as is.  Even using INDEX www/en/ports
is most time and cpu consuming part (except *maybe* doc/) of www tree.
We don't need to get www builder machine into yet another ports index
tester.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040311224750.GA20712>