Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:47:30 -0800 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Dan Rue <drue@therub.org> Subject: Re: Downgrading 4.9-stable to 4.9-release-p3 Message-ID: <200403181047.30188.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <20040318180927.GD18657@therub.org> References: <20040318180927.GD18657@therub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 18 March 2004 10:09 am, Dan Rue wrote: > I upgraded some servers to 4.9-stable a few weeks ago, not realizing > that I really wanted releng_4_9. Since I have to apply this openssl > fix anyway, I thought I could go from 4.9-stable to releng_4_9 no > problem. The alternative, as I see it, is to wait for 4.10 to come > and upgrade to that. Am I going to run into problems going from > 4.9-stable to releng_4_9? It would appear to me that you are fixing something that isn't broken. > > If I can sneak in a second question. With this openssl fix, couldn't > I just apply the patch, cd /usr/src/crypto/openssl && make install ? > Instead of the recommended buildworld fiasco? > How are you going to include the changed libraries in modules you don't rebuild? The advisory was even more specific, i.e., rebuild all ports that use OpenSSL. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403181047.30188.kstewart>