Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:16:18 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Cc:        amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 32 bit libraries - build hack
Message-ID:  <20040322181618.GA37994@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040322174128.GA80029@ns1.xcllnt.net>
References:  <200403212012.29053.peter@wemm.org> <20040322075328.GA20922@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040322174128.GA80029@ns1.xcllnt.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:41:28AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 11:53:28PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 08:12:29PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > mkdir /lib32
> > > mkdir /usr/lib32
> > > mkdir /usr/local/lib32
> > > mkdir /usr/X11R6/lib32
> > 
> > "lib32" should be reserved for 32-bit libs that are specific to AMD64
> > (and either won't run on i386, or will run very sub-optimally).  These
> > libs should live in lib/i386.
> 
> Agreed. A better place for FreeBSD/i386 libraries is under /compat.

Not quite what I said. :-)  I disagree with /compat unless we start
putting releng4 libs in /compat/freebsd4-ia32 on 5-current.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040322181618.GA37994>