Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:41:30 +0300 (MSK) From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb.quenot@caraldi.com> Cc: naddy@mips.inka.de Subject: Re: Sign your name in pkg-descr is useless or useful? Message-ID: <20040327013730.F96451@avim.ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040326181845.GA1618@anyware12.anyware> References: <opr5eiuf0f8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <c3uoks$193u$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <4062FF7A.2040509@ciam.ru> <c3v3kn$1drs$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <40642549.6050202@ciam.ru><20040326181845.GA1618@anyware12.anyware>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > * Will Andrews: > > > MAINTAINER= email@address Name1 Name2 Name3 ... > > > > ... this will still allow programs that interpret MAINTAINER directly > > by taking the second field (whitespace delimiter) to work correctly, > > and makes writing said function simple. > > FWIW, there is also the Usenet notation: > > MAINTAINER= login@domain.com (FirstName LastName) IMHO the best is: FirstName LastName <login@domain.com> This notation should be passed to MTA and most MUA without modification AFAIK. --- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040327013730.F96451>