Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:51:40 +0200 From: Jean-Pierre PARISY <jpparisy@teaser.fr> To: <igorpopov@newmail.ru> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: natd and tun Message-ID: <200404021751.i32Hpeud071280@chuck.bsdjpp.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20040402073338.26179.qmail@flock1.newmail.ru> References: <20040402073338.26179.qmail@flock1.newmail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:33:37 +0400, ????? ????? ?????????? wrote: > Hi, > I have a question: would be natd work with tun device? I had already asked > this question when FreeBSD 5.2 were released > Someone have answered to me that I should use ppp builtin nat, because divert > sockets doesn't work with tun. Simple rules like this > divert all from any to any via tun0 > allow all from any to any > did not work. I'm sure that this works: # Divert all packets through the tunnel interface. /sbin/ipfw add 100 divert natd all from any to any via tun0 -- There's no Kabal.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404021751.i32Hpeud071280>