Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 17:06:41 -0600 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: java@FreeBSD.org Cc: Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr> Subject: Re: [ports-i386@bento.FreeBSD.org: jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.1 failed on i386 4] Message-ID: <20040409230641.GE8348@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20040409064800.GB43513@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <20040409005035.GY42056@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040409064800.GB43513@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:48:00AM +0200, Herve Quiroz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:50:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > ===> jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ant - found > > ===> jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.1 depends on file: /usr/local/share/java/classes/commons-pool.jar - found > > ===> jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.1 depends on file: /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.3.1/bin/java - found > > So the port is built with JDK 1.3... Yes...you made that the default in the new bsd.java.mk :). Maybe we should revert to 1.4 being the default? > ..and javax.sql.* is a new feature from JDK 1.4 > > Which advocates (again) for binary Java ports. ;) > > Anyway, I can send a fix for that if you want but we have two options > here: > > - Update Makefile to enforce the use of JDK 1.4 (JAVA_VERSION=1.4+) > which is bad as JDK 1.2/1.3 users should be able to use it anyway. > - Switch to a binary port (NO_BUILD=yes) which is bad for many ethic > reasons (debated in many occasions by many people). > > Up to the maintainer... Option 3. Specify 1.4 as a BUILD_DEPENDS and 1.4 as a RUN_DEPENDS. Can we do that with the new bsd.java.mk? Is that a reasonable thing to do? -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040409230641.GE8348>