Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:51:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Ludo Koren <lk@tempest.sk> To: tscrum@aaawebsolution.com Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting bandwith Message-ID: <200404141451.i3EEpjJH069188@lk106.tempest.sk> In-Reply-To: <004e01c4221d$12e96c60$6466a8c0@wolf> (tscrum@aaawebsolution.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I do not believe there is a way to "postpone" traffic with
> dummynet other than what is available with queues, not to
> mention I don't think you'd ever want to, really. The config
> below will give mail a lower priority to all of the other
> traffic, both in and out.
> Nat interactive addresses? Hmmm... you mean you want ipfw to
> forward local addresses using nat? you want to dole out local
> ip addresses, dhcp? Not really sure of the question here, but
> I'm sure its answered by following the link below to the
> freebsd handbook.
I wrote `interactive' (ticks), and I meant addresses that are used to
connect to ssh, web, etc (interactive processes). All these addresses
are NAT-ed. For these, your setup is working fine. Thank you very
much.
The problem, I still have, is the following: the SMTP is flowing
through, I am not relaying e-mail on this host. It seems to me, I
cannot put together a rule which pass the traffic and add it to the
queue except when I use keep-state flag. In this setup (keep-state),
Luigi wrote it does not work.
Regards,
lk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404141451.i3EEpjJH069188>