Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:58:58 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is the story on if_index allocation ? Message-ID: <20040420235858.B47612@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <40861A71.1020502@he.iki.fi>; from pete@he.iki.fi on Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:53:37AM %2B0300 References: <20040419110912.A71274@xorpc.icir.org> <408613F7.1090806@he.iki.fi> <20040420233818.B43347@xorpc.icir.org> <40861A71.1020502@he.iki.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:53:37AM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote: ... > Relevant quote from the RFC: a very appropriate one indeed, which seems to substantiate my point. > interfaces that might be added dynamically. The exact meaning of a > "different" interface is hard to define, and there will be gray > areas. Any firm definition in this document would likely turn out to > be inadequate. Instead, implementors must choose what it means in > their particular situation, subject to the following rules: so if there are gray areas in defining 'different' the same applies to defining 'same' :) cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040420235858.B47612>