Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:56:25 +0000
From:      Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Gregory Edigarov <greg@profi.kharkov.ua>
Subject:   Re: altq in main tree?
Message-ID:  <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua>
References:  <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 11:48, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main
> tree in the near future?

I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the outcome 
is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy to do. But as 
vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem these days, we will 
have to see how it works out.

Also there are some other items on my schedule which must be complete 
beforehand.

-- 
Best regards,				| mlaier@freebsd.org
Max Laier				| ICQ #67774661
http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/	| mlaier@EFnet

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAhouiXyyEoT62BG0RApXDAJ9zajFOkwUoBENsbnazwQXWhQ5NEQCdH3au
zYZbMq/lv10ERRfR7OpHhQk=
=KZIf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404211456.34624.max>