Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:04:25 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NONAME alpha system up for grabs
Message-ID:  <20040422160425.GF78422@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <874qrcf1sp.fsf@strauser.com>
References:  <20040422104146.GA46862@chuggalug.clues.com> <20040422132631.GA28789@freebie.xs4all.nl> <874qrcf1sp.fsf@strauser.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:52:06AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> > Whoever responds: you sure want the cache rams to go with it, it makes a
> > considerable speed difference. It will not get fast, it will get less
> > slow, you get the drift.
> 
> I'd asked before but didn't get much of a response:
> 
> I have a Cabriolet (275MHz) with 2MB of cache, and a manual that says I can
> increase that to 8.  Would that make a noticeable difference in make jobs,
> like running a make buildworld?

I've timed two Alpha's that differed only in cache size (2MB vs. 4MB).
It would make a difference in 'make world' times.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040422160425.GF78422>