Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 17:28:33 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Subject: Re: USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk? Message-ID: <200405031728.36587.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <40963ECD.6030901@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040503122023.GF27940@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <40963ECD.6030901@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_kUmlABVL6OmrSlx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 03 May 2004 14:45, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Volker Stolz wrote: > > For one of my ports, portlint now complaints: > > FATAL: Makefile [61]: USE_QT_VER is set after including bsd.port.pre.mk. > > > > I'm really at a loss on how to fix this, since USE_QT_VER depends on > > OPTIONS in my case. Is there something like an approved workaround? > > E.g. splitting this in master/slave(s)? > > A fix would be son-of-PR 64233, but currently that's far behind in my > queue, because it's absolutely no fun to work on it. So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port maintainers= =20 serves no purpose? =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_kUmlABVL6OmrSlx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAlmUkXhc68WspdLARAuMmAKChnKXFKBhxkO0+OzjXyS9ERtrVbQCgmP+c XbDWxjBSjDQesD6MmZKjmEU= =vWs6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_kUmlABVL6OmrSlx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405031728.36587.michaelnottebrock>