Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 13:28:32 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org> To: Kay Lehmann <kay_lehmann@web.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade and daemons. Message-ID: <20040523122832.GF40899@genius.tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <40B09066.1020300@web.de> References: <20040523101300.GA43113@genius.tao.org.uk> <40B09066.1020300@web.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3oCie2+XPXTnK5a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:52:06PM +0200, Kay Lehmann wrote: >=20 > As far as I know this isn't the job of portupgrade. Normally it should=20 > be handeled by the port itself, which could stop daemons with=20 > appropriate set (de)install targets. > I think a lot of the ports do this quite properly. Moving this to Mk=20 > looks quite complicated and I think it would be the best to leave it in= =20 > the ports, since they should know what is required to do. >=20 Ah ok. That makes sense. Do you know of a port that does this properly off the top of your head? Joe --=20 Josef Karthauser (joe@tao.org.uk) http://www.josef-k.net/ FreeBSD (cvs meister, admin and hacker) http://www.uk.FreeBSD.org/ Physics Particle Theory (student) http://www.pact.cpes.sussex.ac.uk/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D An eclectic mix of fact an= d theory. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --3oCie2+XPXTnK5a5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkCwmO8ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBa01ACfYaBga9Kl82/meQ5zhsaztpwS Lx8AoNKWJWIvZL/+zKu4yHhTGTEP5Ff0 =c83v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3oCie2+XPXTnK5a5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040523122832.GF40899>