Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:53:37 GMT From: Linus Sjoberg <lsjoberg@aland.net> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/67762: portupgrade of stunnel asks for input even when run with BATCH=1 Message-ID: <200406091753.i59HrbAN094410@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200406091800.i59I0g84033221@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 67762 >Category: ports >Synopsis: portupgrade of stunnel asks for input even when run with BATCH=1 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Jun 09 18:00:42 GMT 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Linus Sjoberg >Release: 4.10-STABLE >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD hal9000.alcom.aland.fi 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #17: Wed Jun 2 09:32:15 EEST 2004 root@hal9000.alcom.aland.fi:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAL i386 >Description: When doing a ports upgrade using # BATCH=1 portupgrade -a you expect all upgrades to be performed without any interaction with the user. This is not true for stunnel. When I checked my portupgrade today it was hung waiting for input with the prompt: "Remove group stunnel? [y/n]" Appearently this is due to the stunnel deinstall-script. After entering a 'n' the upgrade continued as espected. Either the deinstall should not ask the question or otherwise stunnel should not be upgraded when running portupgrade when BATCH is set. >How-To-Repeat: I have not tried to reproduce this, but it should suffice to run portupgrade with BATCH set when there is a newer stunnel available. >Fix: Check for BATCH in stunnel Makefile. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406091753.i59HrbAN094410>