Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 09:59:12 +0100 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Scott Mitchell <scott+freebsd@fishballoon.org> Cc: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> Subject: Re: /bin/ls sorting bug? Message-ID: <20040620085912.GA7301@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <20040619225229.GE462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <20040619175007.GB462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <414787887.20040619210137@andric.com> <20040619193545.GC462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <14210101.20040619220601@andric.com> <20040619225229.GE462@tuatara.fishballoon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:52:29PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:06:01PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > Looking through ls source shows that the sorting is done by passing a
> > comparison function to fts_open(3). In the case of sorting by
> > modification time, the *only* comparison made is of the mtime fields:
>
> You did see the patch attached to my original post, right? It modifies all
> of these comparison functions to sort the two items by name (or reverse
> name) in the case that their timestamps are equal.
Hi Scott,
Could you produce a version of your patch that uses the nanoseconds
field too? I produced the one below, but I think the style in your
patch was nicer. Also, I wonder if the revblahcmp functions should
just call blahcmp with their arguments reversed?
David.
Index: cmp.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/FreeBSD-CVS/src/bin/ls/cmp.c,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.13 cmp.c
--- cmp.c 6 Apr 2004 20:06:47 -0000 1.13
+++ cmp.c 19 Jun 2004 21:23:01 -0000
@@ -63,35 +63,107 @@
int
modcmp(const FTSENT *a, const FTSENT *b)
{
- return (b->fts_statp->st_mtime - a->fts_statp->st_mtime);
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_sec >
+ a->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_sec)
+ return 1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_sec <
+ a->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_sec)
+ return -1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_nsec >
+ a->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return 1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_nsec <
+ a->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return -1;
+ return (strcoll(a->fts_name, b->fts_name));
}
int
revmodcmp(const FTSENT *a, const FTSENT *b)
{
- return (a->fts_statp->st_mtime - b->fts_statp->st_mtime);
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_sec >
+ b->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_sec)
+ return 1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_sec <
+ b->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_sec)
+ return -1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_nsec >
+ b->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return 1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_nsec <
+ b->fts_statp->st_mtimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return -1;
+ return (strcoll(b->fts_name, a->fts_name));
}
int
acccmp(const FTSENT *a, const FTSENT *b)
{
- return (b->fts_statp->st_atime - a->fts_statp->st_atime);
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_sec >
+ a->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_sec)
+ return 1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_sec <
+ a->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_sec)
+ return -1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_nsec >
+ a->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return 1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_nsec <
+ a->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return -1;
+ return (strcoll(a->fts_name, b->fts_name));
}
int
revacccmp(const FTSENT *a, const FTSENT *b)
{
- return (a->fts_statp->st_atime - b->fts_statp->st_atime);
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_sec >
+ b->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_sec)
+ return 1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_sec <
+ b->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_sec)
+ return -1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_nsec >
+ b->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return 1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_nsec <
+ b->fts_statp->st_atimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return -1;
+ return (strcoll(b->fts_name, a->fts_name));
}
int
statcmp(const FTSENT *a, const FTSENT *b)
{
- return (b->fts_statp->st_ctime - a->fts_statp->st_ctime);
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_sec >
+ a->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_sec)
+ return 1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_sec <
+ a->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_sec)
+ return -1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_nsec >
+ a->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return 1;
+ if (b->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_nsec <
+ a->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return -1;
+ return (strcoll(a->fts_name, b->fts_name));
}
int
revstatcmp(const FTSENT *a, const FTSENT *b)
{
- return (a->fts_statp->st_ctime - b->fts_statp->st_ctime);
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_sec >
+ b->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_sec)
+ return 1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_sec <
+ b->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_sec)
+ return -1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_nsec >
+ b->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return 1;
+ if (a->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_nsec <
+ b->fts_statp->st_ctimespec.tv_nsec)
+ return -1;
+ return (strcoll(b->fts_name, a->fts_name));
}
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040620085912.GA7301>
