Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:09:14 -0600 (MDT) From: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: Evgeny Ivanov <evgeny@networkersbg.com> Subject: Re: tables in ipfw2 Message-ID: <20040624010726.H5174@skywalker.rogness.net> In-Reply-To: <20040624064350.GA62743@ip.net.ua> References: <200406240636.i5O6adNV000825@ns.networkersbg.com> <20040624064350.GA62743@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:36:39AM +0300, Evgeny Ivanov wrote: >> >> Hi again, >> >> :)) It may be very boring but after making wolrd to the latest 4.10 >> source, I still dont have the table option. I have recompiled the ipfw >> and libalias with ipfw2 support and kernel too. What I am doing wrong >> ?? >> > 1. Add ``IPFW2=YES'' in /etc/make.conf. > 2. Recompile world (``make buildworld''). > 3. Recompile kernel: if you want firewall built statically into > your kernel, make sure to add ``options IPFW2'' into your > kernel config. Otherwise, the ipfw.ko will be built with > IPFW (due to IPFW2=YES in /etc/make.conf). > > Is there any reason why IPFW2 has not become the standard IPFW...still not stable enough or ??? IPFW2 is backwards compatible with IPFW is it not? Seems to work great for me :-) Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> - How many people here have telekenetic powers? Raise my hand. -Emo Philips
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040624010726.H5174>