Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:29:13 +0300 (EEST) From: Evgeny Ivanov <evgeny@networkersbg.com> To: rizzo@icir.org, nick@rogness.net Cc: "freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: tables in ipfw2 Message-ID: <200406240929.i5O9TDBD000460@ns.networkersbg.com> In-Reply-To: <20040624004039.A62893@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So you mean that it is only in 5.x branch. Is there a patch for 4.10 RELENG ? Regards Evgeny On 6/24/2004, "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:09:14AM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote: >.... >> =09Is there any reason why IPFW2 has not become the standard >> =09IPFW...still not stable enough or ??? IPFW2 is backwards >> =09compatible with IPFW is it not? > >at the time people wanted to check it for a while to make >sure there weren't issues. I guess that given the option, >this satisfied both worlds, so nobody cared to change >the standard (the only reason for doing that would be >remove ipfw1 at the next time there is a system change >that would require an ipfw1 patch). > >=09cheers >=09luigi > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406240929.i5O9TDBD000460>