Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:59:52 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some PRs Message-ID: <20040719075952.GG57678@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <20040719.005825.26202805.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20040718151649.GA53675@gothmog.gr> <20040718165142.GA17142@khazad.dyndns.org> <20040718184008.GC57678@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040719.005825.26202805.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VACxsDaSTfeluoxK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:58:25AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: +> : Even if it is used by some programms, I don't see it in the base syste= m. +> : It can be always implemented as a kernel module and maintained outside +> : the tree. +>=20 +> Given that it is implemented in this driver in about 20 lines, I think +> that it makes sense to have it in the base. Suggesting it be +> maintained outside of the tree is just plain silly. It should be +> brought in or abadoned. It isn't even used by one of our 11000 ports and you want to bring it into base system? We don't have other devices in the tree, which are actually used by some ports. I still think, that if a port which is using /dev/full will be created, device should be maintained there. EOT. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --VACxsDaSTfeluoxK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA+394ForvXbEpPzQRAmWaAKCo1rdLZDTGtjPEWYDo4wK1HFVcQACfQJ7a wKlGPcdV5Z2pzBg9MgjHt48= =K9TJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VACxsDaSTfeluoxK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040719075952.GG57678>