Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:12:58 +0200
From:      Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Radim Kolar <hsn@netmag.cz>
Subject:   Re: configuring ports via Makefile.local
Message-ID:  <200407302113.02313.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040730184715.GA768@galgenberg.net>
References:  <20040727122823.40c6c3c5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20040730165444.GA36115@sanatana.dharma> <20040730184715.GA768@galgenberg.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Boundary-02=_+2pCBvW5CJMjBkX
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 30 July 2004 20:47, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:

> Please NO! OPTIONS are very ugly, IMHO. Imagine installing a new system
> and running a massive portinstall. The only real solutions IMHO are the
> make.conf approach

It's funny how people always critisize OPTIONS for just the wrong reasons.=
=20
Installing a new system or running a massive portinstall is no problem - ju=
st=20
set BATCH and you'll be fine. And if you already know what OPTIONS you want=
,=20
additionally set them in make.conf as usual and you'll be fine, too.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--Boundary-02=_+2pCBvW5CJMjBkX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBCp2+Xhc68WspdLARAoluAJ9Ij7g1meieLwUQbMFH+MjPFxvCAgCfT4iT
dsCVxP7jd7brEDMb4Ix9PT0=
=TE5s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_+2pCBvW5CJMjBkX--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407302113.02313.michaelnottebrock>