Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:23:48 +0400
From:      Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
To:        Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net>
Cc:        cokane@cokane.org
Subject:   Re: Network interface RUNNING and UP flags
Message-ID:  <20040807092347.GB39835@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <1091862376.7840.3.camel@berloga.shadowland>
References:  <346a8022040806145018a5e18@mail.gmail.com> <41140139.5080803@savvis.net> <1091862376.7840.3.camel@berloga.shadowland>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:06:17AM +0300, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
>
> not better move this under tp->tap_mtx mutex without using splX
> functions?

...especially taking into account that splX do nothing
in CURRENT anyway.  Mutex locking framework adopted by
the interface driver should be used of course.

-- 
Yar



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040807092347.GB39835>