Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:40:46 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Muhammad Reza <reza@mra.co.id> Subject: Re: pf and ipfw Message-ID: <200408091840.53308.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <411722A1.1020108@mra.co.id> References: <411722A1.1020108@mra.co.id>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Monday 09 August 2004 09:07, Muhammad Reza wrote: > Dear Lists, > > can pf rule work together with ipfw rules ? > i need pf rule to do some outgoing load balance, but still need ipfw to > do some basic packet filtering, cause i have difficulty to set pf rules > default to block if it's apply with load balancing rules. > please enlight me.. While it is possible to use pf and ipfw in conjunction, it is certainly preferable to settle for either one on its own. It should not be too much of a problem to get pf to do what you want/need. If you have more specific questions you can post to pf4freebsd@freelists.org -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBF6kVXyyEoT62BG0RAub7AJ9k33v+UUYwZLVX1p1xCmkz2ql/RwCffkAj Wleq1V0CeF7IyKWuXBJGipk= =nn7H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408091840.53308.max>