Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:20:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: Toxa <postfix@senmail.ru> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why 6.0-current? Message-ID: <20040820101933.G73388@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20040819185710.GA659@laptoxa.toxa.lan> References: <20040819185710.GA659@laptoxa.toxa.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Toxa wrote: > Recent buildkernel brigns me new os version: > > FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Aug 19 22:28:50 MSD 2004 > > I'm wondering, why HEAD tag is not 5.3-CURRENT? According to > development model, when 5.3-RELEASE will appear, HEAD should becomes 5.4-CURRENT, after 5.4-RELEASE it should bbecomes 5.5-CURRENT, etc... > Why 6.0? New development model? Would u mind to drop a link > describing this. Wow, that took a while for someoen to post the first "Why did my version change?" email. Happens every time within hours for beta/release candidate/releases, I guess -current people actually read the mailing lists. :) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040820101933.G73388>