Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:50:53 +0200
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To:        Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
Cc:        ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: 5.3 beta1 is no go for me.
Message-ID:  <20040830125052.GM59909@cicely12.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <20040830122945.GL59909@cicely12.cicely.de>
References:  <20040830105358.GH59909@cicely12.cicely.de> <48170.1093864941@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040830113609.GJ59909@cicely12.cicely.de> <20040830114821.GK59909@cicely12.cicely.de> <20040830120901.GA50520@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20040830122945.GL59909@cicely12.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:29:46PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:09:01PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:48:22PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote..
> > > Did it ever run FreeBSD before?
> > 
> > Yes, it did. 
> 
> Which version?
> Poul, is it possible to get 4.x boot output?
> 
> But there is a pci1 bus somewehere that doesn't show up by itself
> in the log.
> We have pci0 as the primary bus and the bus behind the bridge gets
> named pci2.
> Looks like the machine check is while probing pci1.
> 
> I've checked the hardware notes and an AS1000A has 7 PCI and 2 EISA
> slots - so we physically have pci1.
> The bridge is on an add-on card, right?

Just checked your picture gallery and the photos show that the bridge
including the qlogic is onboard.
This raises the question if we really have a pci1.
I think the bridge could drive 3 or maybe 4 of the sockets.

The bus number 2 is just what SRM left in the bridge registers for
the OS and FreeBSD just takes it.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
bernd@bwct.de                                  info@bwct.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040830125052.GM59909>