Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:04:36 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org Subject: vuxml corrections (was Re: FreshPorts :: VuXML - 6e740881-0cae-11d9-8a8a-000c41e2cdad) Message-ID: <20040926180436.GA20112@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20040925221034.T54484@xeon.unixathome.org> <4155A7A2.15775.198F30A@localhost> References: <20040925221034.T54484@xeon.unixathome.org> <4155A7A2.15775.198F30A@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for catching and reporting these, Dan! On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 05:15:14PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm looking for additional pairs of eyes to verify that FreshPorts > has marked the correct commits for: > > 6e740881-0cae-11d9-8a8a-000c41e2cdad > > The FreshPorts pages to view are: > > <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla/> > > Nothing affect by this vuln. It seems the affecte versions where > never put into our tree. Ranges are: > > <range><ge>1.7.a,2</ge><lt>1.7</lt></range> > <range><ge>1.8.a,2</ge><lt>1.8.a2,2</lt></range> > > Should that top one be 1.7,2 not 1.7? Yep! Corrected. > There are two packages with the name mozilla. In addition to the URL > listed above, see also: > > <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla-devel/> > > Nothing affecte there. We have only 1.4b-1.6a in the tree. Looks > good. I think I misunderstood something. We certainly have later versions, and the referenced page lists them, e.g. mozilla-1.8.a3,2. > <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla-gtk1/> > > The ranges are: <range><ge>1.7.a</ge><lt>1.7</lt></range> > > Nothing marked at that URL either. > > Is this looking good or bad? Yep, that looks good! On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:13:18PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just looking at "ca6c8f35-0a5f-11d9-ad6f-00061bc2ad93" which contains > this: > > <name>apache13</name> > > But, from what FreshPorts knows, there is no such package. These are the > packages it knows: > > www/apache13-ssl | apache+ssl > www/apache13-modssl+ipv6 | apache+mod_ssl+ipv6 > www/apache13-modssl | apache+mod_ssl > www/apache13-modperl | apache+mod_perl > www/apache13+ipv6 | apache+ipv6 > www/apache13 | apache > www/apache-jserv | apache-jserv > www/apache2 | apache > www/apache-forrest | apache-forrest > www/apache-contrib | apache-contrib > net/apache-soap | apache-soap > devel/apache-ant | apache-ant > sysutils/apachetop | apachetop > > Should the vuln be changed? Is FreshPorts wrong? You are correct, the element <name> is wrong. Corrected. Cheers, -- Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040926180436.GA20112>