Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:04:36 -0500
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
Cc:        freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org
Subject:   vuxml corrections (was Re: FreshPorts :: VuXML - 6e740881-0cae-11d9-8a8a-000c41e2cdad)
Message-ID:  <20040926180436.GA20112@madman.celabo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040925221034.T54484@xeon.unixathome.org> <4155A7A2.15775.198F30A@localhost>
References:  <20040925221034.T54484@xeon.unixathome.org> <4155A7A2.15775.198F30A@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for catching and reporting these, Dan!

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 05:15:14PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm looking for additional pairs of eyes to verify that FreshPorts
> has marked the correct commits for:
>
>     6e740881-0cae-11d9-8a8a-000c41e2cdad
>
> The FreshPorts pages to view are:
>
> <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla/>;
>
> Nothing affect by this vuln.  It seems the affecte versions where
> never put into our tree.  Ranges are:
>
>   <range><ge>1.7.a,2</ge><lt>1.7</lt></range>
>   <range><ge>1.8.a,2</ge><lt>1.8.a2,2</lt></range>
>
> Should that top one be 1.7,2 not 1.7?

Yep!  Corrected.

> There are two packages with the name mozilla.  In addition to the URL
> listed above, see also:
>
> <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla-devel/>;
>
> Nothing affecte there.  We have only 1.4b-1.6a in the tree.  Looks
> good.

I think I misunderstood something.  We certainly have later versions,
and the referenced page lists them, e.g. mozilla-1.8.a3,2.

> <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla-gtk1/>;
>
> The ranges are: <range><ge>1.7.a</ge><lt>1.7</lt></range>
>
> Nothing marked at that URL either.
>
> Is this looking good or bad?

Yep, that looks good!


On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:13:18PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just looking at "ca6c8f35-0a5f-11d9-ad6f-00061bc2ad93" which contains
> this:
>
>  <name>apache13</name>
>
> But, from what FreshPorts knows, there is no such package.  These are the
> packages it knows:
>
>  www/apache13-ssl         | apache+ssl
>  www/apache13-modssl+ipv6 | apache+mod_ssl+ipv6
>  www/apache13-modssl      | apache+mod_ssl
>  www/apache13-modperl     | apache+mod_perl
>  www/apache13+ipv6        | apache+ipv6
>  www/apache13             | apache
>  www/apache-jserv         | apache-jserv
>  www/apache2              | apache
>  www/apache-forrest       | apache-forrest
>  www/apache-contrib       | apache-contrib
>  net/apache-soap          | apache-soap
>  devel/apache-ant         | apache-ant
>  sysutils/apachetop       | apachetop
>
> Should the vuln be changed?  Is FreshPorts wrong?

You are correct, the element <name> is wrong.  Corrected.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio
nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040926180436.GA20112>