Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:59:38 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: E.Schuele@Computer.Org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes Message-ID: <20040930185938.GA4844@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200409301355.29288.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> References: <1ea.2b3eae1a.2e8d9780@aol.com> <200409301355.29288.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:55:29PM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: > Well... you can't get much newer to BSD than me. So, most likely I have = no=20 > place in this thread at all (please be gentle). And I certainly do not= =20 > want to get in the middle of something that appears to be on the virge of= =20 > becoming personal... >=20 > But.... >=20 > I was experiencing very VERY poor performance TCP/IP wise, untill I dug u= p=20 > a tip from google.... > Someone mentioned that many ISPs do not fully support IPv6, and that 5.2.= 1=20 > would try to use it first.... and then after a timeout it would try IPv4.= =20 No, that's referring to order of DNS lookups and your ISP's broken nameserver, not TCP/IP performance. Kris --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXFeZWry0BWjoQKURAjbHAJ9HbO9rMUxmLbs57KHPTF7G7nMHrACg9bt1 6tv+/0P2xIXloNr3hGzeP60= =iBlE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040930185938.GA4844>