Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:50:21 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Email nagging, was: Re: Ports with version numbers goingbackwards: graphics/gd,japanese/gd, ukrain... Message-ID: <20041012235021.GF10363@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410121843030.2317-100000@pancho> References: <B06C0FC0-1CA6-11D9-A5A5-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410121843030.2317-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:43:55PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > > Uhm, I wonder why you are fine with hourly `INDEX build failed' > > messages, but oppose those addressing PORTVERSION. Any crucial > > difference I'm missing? > > N ports vs M ports, N >> M. I like solid arguments, but can you please explain what N and what M stands for? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041012235021.GF10363>