Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:14:40 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Choy Kho Yee <khoyee@tf7.so-net.ne.jp>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 5.3-STABLE?
Message-ID:  <20041018021440.GC86036@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <03FF0AEE-20AB-11D9-B097-000A95BE58A4@tf7.so-net.ne.jp>
References:  <20041017165815.GE98300@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com> <20041017171142.GC37640@werd> <03FF0AEE-20AB-11D9-B097-000A95BE58A4@tf7.so-net.ne.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--qjNfmADvan18RZcF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:11:26AM +0900, Choy Kho Yee wrote:
> On 2004/10/18, at 2:11, Radek Kozlowski wrote:
>=20
> >On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Mark Frank wrote:
> >>Yesterday I did a fresh install off of a 5.3beta5 CD and them before
> >>going to bed last night I cvsup'ed with a "*default release=3Dcvs
> >>tag=3DRELENG_5" and a buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel cycle.
> >>
> >>I had expected to end up with 5.3beta7 but to my surprise I ended up=20
> >>with
> >>a "uname -a" of:
> >>
> >>FreeBSD guinness.local.mark-and-erika.com 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD=20
> >>5.3-STABLE #0:
> >>Sun Oct 17 02:47:12 EDT 2004
> >>root@guinness.local.mark-and-erika.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC=20
> >>i386
> >>
> >>Do I really have 5.3-STABLE or am I missing something? I can't find
> >>any announcement on the freebsd.org web site.  Is this really
> >>5.3-STABLE?  I assumed there would be a 5.3-RC1...or is this it?
> >
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033698.html
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033702.html
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033703.html
> >
> >-Radek
>=20
> Sorry but I am not very sure about this after reading the above CVS=20
> commit messages.
> Does that mean if we don't want to follow the -STABLE branch but would=20
> like to stick
> to 5.3-RELEASE, this is the time to change the tag to "RELENG_5_3" or=20
> else we would
> end up with -STABLE?

Yes.

Kris
--qjNfmADvan18RZcF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBcycQWry0BWjoQKURApp7AKDRFulfBRoMuvppZXSMKiXfyHjYkwCdGfBM
JYbT3dzDACz5uVQcuT/R50U=
=eTaO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qjNfmADvan18RZcF--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018021440.GC86036>