Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:49:38 +0200 From: h <h@erathia.be> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, Odhiambo Washington <wash@wananchi.com>, FBSD-Q <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 5.3-STABLE ???? Message-ID: <200410181449.38199.h@erathia.be> In-Reply-To: <20041018075641.GA24712@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20041018074431.GE35360@ns2.wananchi.com> <20041018075641.GA24712@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 18 October 2004 09:56, Matthew Seaman wrote: > No -- that's expected. Once the RELENG_5_3 branch was created, the > RELENG_5 branch would be relabeld as -STABLE. Note that these are > just technical changes to the CVS repository and that all they do is > presage the actual release/launch of those OS versions. ie. You might > be seeing 5.3-STABLE in your uname(1) output, but it isn't official > until the project announces it. > > If your eventual aim is to install 5.3-RELEASE, this would be a good > time to change your supfile to track RELENG_5_3. Again -- that's just > producing release candidates at the moment: the release isn't official > until it's announced. if 5.3 hits the -STABLE tag does that mean my 4.*-STABLE boxes are going to download the 5.*-STABLES sources or are they safe with their tag ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410181449.38199.h>